Last week, I came across a project called awesome-design-md on GitHub that gained 23k stars in just one week.

Upon checking it out, it's essentially an aggregated repository of design specifications. For products like Stripe, Notion, Linear, Figma, Apple, etc., there's a DESIGN.md file for each, which structures details such as colors, fonts, spacing, component states, and responsive breakpoints.

It's also easy to use — no need to install Figma or learn any complex tools; just edit the Markdown directly. Copy and paste, and you can get a decent style match.

In my opinion, the project's popularity stems from addressing a core pain point: many teams, especially small teams and indie developers, simply don't have the resources or energy to build a complete design system from scratch. But if you code UI directly without one, the result always feels lacking. Now, you can just "copy homework".

Of course, even if you copy, some things still need to be adapted to your needs. One comment was quite insightful:

> UI isn't an art piece; it's a road sign.

The idea is that users interact with interfaces primarily to "navigate" rather than to appreciate. Cognitive fluency matters more than visual flair. This is a bit counterintuitive — many designers (including my former self) think the more flashy the UI, the better, but what users actually want is a "no-brainer" smooth experience.

So the value of these specifications isn't just "good looks" — it's "familiarity". When your color schemes, spacing, and interaction patterns are similar to the products users use daily, the learning curve naturally flattens.

For developers, instead of agonizing over design for hours, it's better to refer directly to these proven solutions that have been validated by the market. Spending the saved time on the core functionality might be more cost-effective.

---

---

Project link: https://github.com/alsaydi/awesome-design-md